Susan B Anthony Women’s rights speech 1873

Susan B. Anthony on a Woman’s Right to Vote – 1873
Woman’s Rights to the SuƯrage
by Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906)
1873
This speech was delivered in 1873, after Anthony was arrested, tried and fined $100 for
voting in the 1872 presidential election.
Friends and Fellow Citizens: I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged
crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote.
It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no
crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen’s rights, guaranteed to me and all United
States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any State to deny.
The preamble of the Federal Constitution says:
“We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish
justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general
welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we,
the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of
liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to
the whole people–women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women
of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only
means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government–the ballot.
For any State to make sex a qualification that must ever result in the disfranchisement of
one entire half of the people is to pass a bill of attainder, or an ex post facto law, and is
therefore a violation of the supreme law of the land. By it the blessings of liberty are for ever
withheld from women and their female posterity. To them this government has no just
powers derived from the consent of the governed. To them this government is not a
democracy. It is not a republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful oligarchy of sex; the
most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy of wealth,
where the right govern the poor. An oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern the
ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured;
but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over
the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household–which ordains all men
sovereigns, all women subjects, carries dissension, discord and rebellion into every home
of the nation.
Webster, Worcester and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States,
entitled to vote and hold oƯice.
The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of
our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are
citizens; and no State has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall
abridge their privileges or immunities. Hence, every discrimination against women in the
constitutions and laws of the several States is today null and void, precisely as in every one
against Negroes.